ArticleACS engineering Au2024
Interplay of Spatial and Topological Defects in Polymer Networks.
Article in ACS engineering Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale analysis of sulfur-bridge topology and linear mechanical response in natural rubber.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Article
- Modeling Targeted Mechanochemistry in Polymeric Solids.Chemical reviews · 2026Review
- Effect of Cross-Link Homogeneity on the High-Strain Behavior of Elastic Polymer Networks.Macromolecules · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer networks are widely used in applications, and the formation of a network and its gel point can be predicted. However, the effects of spatial and topological heterogeneity on the resulting network structure and ultimately the mechanical properties, are less understood. To address this challenge, we generate in silico random networks of cross-linked polymer chains with controlled spatial and topological defects. While all fully reacted networks investigated in this study have the same number of end-functionalized polymer strands and cross-linkers, we vary the degree of spatial and topological heterogeneities systematically. We find that spatially heterogeneous cross-linker distributions result in a reduction in the network's primary loops with increased spatial heterogeneity, the opposite trend as observed in homogeneous networks. By performing molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the mechanical properties of the networks. Even though spatially heterogeneous networks have more elastically active strands and cross-linkers, they break at lower extensions than the homogeneous networks and sustain slightly lower maximum stresses. Their shear moduli are higher, i.e., stiffer, than theoretically predicted, and higher than their homogeneous gel counterparts. Our results highlight that topological loop defects and spatial heterogeneities result in significantly different network structures and, ultimately, different mechanical properties.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.