Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911925›Full record

ArticleNMC case report journal2024

Endoscopic Cerebellar Necrosectomy for Space-occupying Cerebellar Infarction: A Case Report.

Yu Naruse, Mio Endo, Dai Uzuki, Kiyoshi Saito

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in NMC case report journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu NaruseDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Rosai Hospital, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.
Mio EndoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Rosai Hospital, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.
Dai UzukiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Japanese Red Cross Society Fukushima Hospital, Fukushima, Fukushima, Japan.
Kiyoshi SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fukushima Rosai Hospital, Iwaki, Fukushima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suboccipital decompressive craniectomy with or without resection of necrosis is the preferred treatment for space-occupying cerebellar infarctions with neurological deterioration due to brainstem compression and obstructive hydrocephalus. We herein present our experience with treating space-occupying cerebellar infarctions successfully using endoscopic necrosectomy. A total of 27 patients were admitted to our hospital due to cerebellar infarctions between April 2021 and November 2023. Four patients required surgical interventions due to a drop in consciousness level or compression of the fourth ventricle and brainstem with acute hydrocephalus confirmed by a computed tomography (CT) scan. Three patients were performed endoscopic necrosectomy through a burr hole in a supine-lateral position. Removing most of the necrotic tissue was possible, resulting in early decompression of the fourth ventricle and brainstem. Endoscopic necrosectomy is less invasive than suboccipital decompressive craniectomy. An endoscopic necrosectomy can be performed for patients with unstable health conditions in a supine-lateral position. Therefore, endoscopic necrosectomy might be an effective method for treating patients with space-occupying cerebellar infarctions and poor general condition, although an objective evaluation of the extent and degree of removal is needed.

Indexed as

endoscopic surgerynecrosectomyspace-occupying cerebellar infarction

Identifiers

PMID38911925
PMCPMC11190657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.