ArticleACS omega2024
Bioinformatics Analysis and Experimental Verification Define Different Angiogenesis Subtypes in Endometrial Carcinoma and Identify a Prognostic Signature.
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing evidence indicates that peripheral blood vessels play a pivotal role in regulating tumor growth with the presence of new blood vessels facilitating tumor growth and metastasis. Nevertheless, the impact of specific molecule-mediated angiogenesis on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and individual prognosis of uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) remains uncertain. The transcriptome information on 217 prognostic angiogenesis-related genes was integrated, and the angiogenesis patterns of 506 UCEC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) cohort were comprehensively evaluated. We identified five angiogenic subtypes, namely, EC1, EC2, EC3, EC4, and EC5, which differed significantly in terms of prognosis, clinicopathological features, cancer hallmarks, genomic mutations, TIME patterns, and immunotherapy responses. Additionally, an angiogenesis-related prognostic risk score (APRS) was constructed to enable an individualized comprehensive evaluation. In multiple cohorts, APRS demonstrated a powerful predictive ability for the prognosis of UCEC patients. Likewise, APRS was confirmed to be associated with clinicopathological features, genomic mutations, cancer hallmarks, and TIME patterns in UCEC patients. The predictability of APRS for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy was also salient. Subsequently, the expression levels of four angiogenesis-related hub genes were verified by qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and single-cell sequencing data analysis. The effects of four representative genes on angiogenesis were validated by Wound-Healing and Transwell assays, tube formation assay in vitro, and tumor xenograft model in vivo. This study proffered a new classification of UCEC patients based on angiogenesis. The established APRS may contribute to individualized prognosis prediction and immunotherapy selections that are better suited for UCEC patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.