Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911612›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2023

Co-designing a recruitment strategy for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals: protocol for a mixed-methods study.

Brona Mulligan, Maeve Reilly, Ahmeda Ali, Conor Murphy, Sam McGlynn, Mohammed Alam, Frank Doyle, Seamus Cotter, Laura Heavey, Kate Brain and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Brona MulliganDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8252-5200
Maeve ReillyDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-1680
Ahmeda AliDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Conor MurphyDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Sam McGlynnDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Mohammed AlamDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Frank DoyleDepartment of Health Psychology, School of Population Health, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3785-7433
Seamus CotterPatient and Public Involvement (PPI), Irish Lung Cancer Community, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5680-2772
Laura HeaveyNational Screening Service, Health Service Executive (HSE), Dublin, Ireland.
Kate BrainDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Nicole RankinSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Grace McCutchanDivision of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Patrick RedmondDepartment of General Practice, Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with early detection through screening critical to improving patient outcomes. However, recruiting high-risk individuals, particularly in deprived populations, for screening remains a considerable challenge. This study aims to co-design a targeted recruitment strategy for lung cancer screening, tailored to the specific needs and experiences of high-risk individuals, in collaboration with a Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) panel and expert stakeholders in Ireland. Methods: We will employ a mixed-methods design guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing complex interventions. Our approach will integrate systematic review findings on screening participation interventions, evaluation of the recruitment strategy's feasibility in an Irish context, and the application of behavioural science frameworks. The target population includes individuals aged 55-74 who reside in highly deprived areas and are at high risk of developing lung cancer based on the National Lung Screening Trial criteria, as well as those eligible for our Lung Health Check trial who met equivalent risk thresholds. Conclusion: This co-designed recruitment strategy will combine evidence-based research, local context understanding, and stakeholder input to develop a solution that is both scientifically robust and tailored to the target population's needs. This patient-centred approach aims to increase the potential for successful implementation of lung cancer screening programs, thereby improving early detection and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AttitudesLung neoplasms; Primary Health Care; Screening; Implementation Science; Health KnowledgePractice

Identifiers

PMID38911612
PMCPMC11190654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.