Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024

Characterization of antiseizure medications effects on the EEG neurodynamic by fractal dimension.

Camillo Porcaro, Dario Seppi, Giovanni Pellegrino, Filippo Dainese, Benedetta Kassabian, Luciano Pellegrino, Gianluigi De Nardi, Alberto Grego, Maurizio Corbetta, Florinda Ferreri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Camillo PorcaroDepartment of Neuroscience and Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dario SeppiNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni PellegrinoEpilepsy Program, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Filippo DaineseNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Benedetta KassabianNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Luciano PellegrinoNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Gianluigi De NardiNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Alberto GregoNeurology Clinics, Azienda Ospedale Università, Padua, Italy.
Maurizio Corbetta *Department of Neuroscience and Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Florinda Ferreri *Department of Neuroscience and Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: An important challenge in epilepsy is to define biomarkers of response to treatment. Many electroencephalography (EEG) methods and indices have been developed mainly using linear methods, e.g., spectral power and individual alpha frequency peak (IAF). However, brain activity is complex and non-linear, hence there is a need to explore EEG neurodynamics using nonlinear approaches. Here, we use the Fractal Dimension (FD), a measure of whole brain signal complexity, to measure the response to anti-seizure therapy in patients with Focal Epilepsy (FE) and compare it with linear methods. Materials: Twenty-five drug-responder (DR) patients with focal epilepsy were studied before (t1, named DR-t1) and after (t2, named DR-t2) the introduction of the anti-seizure medications (ASMs). DR-t1 and DR-t2 EEG results were compared against 40 age-matched healthy controls (HC). Methods: EEG data were investigated from two different angles: frequency domain-spectral properties in δ, θ, α, β, and γ bands and the IAF peak, and time-domain-FD as a signature of the nonlinear complexity of the EEG signals. Those features were compared among the three groups. Results: The δ power differed between DR patients pre and post-ASM and HC (DR-t1 vs. HC, Discussion: FD measured in baseline EEG signals is a non-linear brain measure of complexity more sensitive than EEG power or IAF in detecting a response to ASMs. This likely reflects the non-oscillatory nature of neural activity, which FD better describes. Conclusion: Our work suggests that FD is a promising measure to monitor the response to ASMs in FE.

Indexed as

antiseizure medicationsbiomarkersfocal epilepsyfractal dimensionquantitative-EEG

Identifiers

PMID38911599
PMCPMC11192015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.