ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
The Piggyback Superficial Circumflex Iliac Perforator Flap for Complex Free Flap Reconstructions.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flap-to-flap neovascularization for extended soft-tissue reconstruction of the upper-limb.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Double free flap reconstruction using the piggyback technique for multifocal scalp radiation necrosis: a case report.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of a Complex Foot Defect with a Chimeric Triple-Component Osteocutaneous SCIP-SIEA Free Flap: A Case Report and Literature Review.Archives of plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Application of Combined SCIP and Free Fibula Flaps for Reconstruction of a Massive Composite Oromandibular Defect: A Pioneering Approach.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article introduces a reproducible strategy for complex reconstruction scenarios that require the use of two flaps. It specifically focuses on the utilization of the superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator (SCIP) flap as a secondary flap, particularly in complex cases where available arterial options are limited. In the first scenario, the SCIP flap is elevated simultaneously during elevation of a fibula bone flap. The pedicle of the fibula flap will be anastomosed to the recipient vessels, and the pedicle artery of the SCIP flap, the superficial circumflex iliac artery, will be anastomosed to the distal end of the peroneal artery. The SCIP flap pedicle offers greater length compared with a cutaneous flap sourced from the peroneal artery, thus providing increased flexibility for the flap inset. In the second scenario, the SCIP flap is combined with the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap to manage a significant defect. The pedicle of the ALT flap is anastomosed to the recipient vessels, and the superficial circumflex iliac artery is anastomosed to the distal end of the pedicle artery of the ALT flap, the descending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery. The SCIP flap can be harvested simultaneously with a fibula flap or an ALT flap from the same side, and its arterial anastomosis can always be established with the distal ends of the arterial pedicle of these two flaps. This efficient and reproducible method can also contribute to minimal donor site morbidity and will be particularly valuable in settings where recipient artery choices are limited.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.