ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2024
Surgical delay in abdominal based flap surgery: a scoping review.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to approach the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap revision for optimal aesthetics.Gland surgery · 2026Review
- Optimizing flap surgery: the need for standardized surgical delay techniques and patient-specific approaches.Annals of translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The abdominal donor site is the most common flap used for breast reconstruction, with flap necrosis a feared complication. The technique of surgical 'delay' involves the inducing of relative ischemia to promote neovascularisation, amongst other metabolic adaptations, and has been used to augment flap vascularity and reduce this complication. There is significant variability in the manner in which flap surgery and surgical delay may be performed, such as the vessels ligated, the presence and degree of flap elevation, and the decision to harvest muscle with the flap, amongst other factors. A formal review of techniques, however, has not yet been performed, and there is no consensus as to the optimal technique for surgical delay. Methods: A scoping review of the current literature was undertaken to determine the optimal surgical delay technique in abdominal-based flap surgery. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Medline databases. Data regarding the type of flap surgery, delay techniques, and corresponding clinical outcomes was collected and categorised by technique type. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for review. Levels of evidence and rates of complications were compared. The range of surgical delay techniques reported in the literature was described. Surgical delay was found to reduce overall complication rates, and the available data suggests it may be particularly beneficial in high-risk patients. Conclusions: The current data support delay as a viable method for reducing rates of complications. Further studies and data are required to compare surgical delay techniques and determine the benefit delay may pose to patients with risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.