Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911569›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2024

Surgical delay in abdominal based flap surgery: a scoping review.

Warren M Rozen, Vikash Yogaraj, Mustafa Siddiqui, Evania Lok, David J Hunter-Smith

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Warren M RozenDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-182X
Vikash YogarajDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Mustafa SiddiquiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Evania LokDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
David J Hunter-SmithDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The abdominal donor site is the most common flap used for breast reconstruction, with flap necrosis a feared complication. The technique of surgical 'delay' involves the inducing of relative ischemia to promote neovascularisation, amongst other metabolic adaptations, and has been used to augment flap vascularity and reduce this complication. There is significant variability in the manner in which flap surgery and surgical delay may be performed, such as the vessels ligated, the presence and degree of flap elevation, and the decision to harvest muscle with the flap, amongst other factors. A formal review of techniques, however, has not yet been performed, and there is no consensus as to the optimal technique for surgical delay. Methods: A scoping review of the current literature was undertaken to determine the optimal surgical delay technique in abdominal-based flap surgery. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Medline databases. Data regarding the type of flap surgery, delay techniques, and corresponding clinical outcomes was collected and categorised by technique type. Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for review. Levels of evidence and rates of complications were compared. The range of surgical delay techniques reported in the literature was described. Surgical delay was found to reduce overall complication rates, and the available data suggests it may be particularly beneficial in high-risk patients. Conclusions: The current data support delay as a viable method for reducing rates of complications. Further studies and data are required to compare surgical delay techniques and determine the benefit delay may pose to patients with risk factors.

Indexed as

anatomybreast reconstructionMicrosurgery

Identifiers

PMID38911569
PMCPMC11193560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.