Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911568›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2024

A literature review: machine learning-based stem cell investigation.

Jinat Ara, Tanzila Khatun

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinat AraDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, University of Pannonia, Veszprem, Hungary.
Tanzila KhatunDepartment of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Independent University of Bangladesh (IUB), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Stem cell (SC) is a crucial factor of the human organ that is significantly important for clinical solutions. However, consideration of SC in the therapeutic or disease classification process is complex in terms of accurate classification and prediction. To overcome this issue, Machine learning (ML) is the most effective technique that is frequently used in cell-based clinical applications for diagnosis, treatment, and disease identification. Recently it has been implemented for SC observation which is a crucial factor for clinical solutions. Thus, the objective of this review work is to represent the effectiveness of ML techniques for SC observation from clinical perspectives with current challenges and future direction for further improvement. Methods: In this study, we conducted a short review of ML-based applications in SCs investigation and classification for the improvement of clinical solutions. We explored studies from five scientific databases (Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed) with several keywords related to the objective of our research study. After primary and secondary screening, 15 articles were utilized for this research study and summarized the observation results in terms of ten aspects (year of publication, focused area, objective, experimented datasets, selected ML classifiers, experimental procedure, classification parameter, overall performance in terms of accuracy, advancements, and limitations) with their current limitations and future improvement directions. Key Content and Findings: The majority of the existing literature review works are limited to focusing on specific SC-based investigation, limited evaluation attributes, and lack of challenges and future improvement suggestions. Also, most of the review work didn't consider the investigation of the effectiveness of the ML technique in SC biology. Therefore, in this paper, we investigate existing literature related to the development of clinical solutions considering ML techniques, in the area of SC and cell culture processes and highlight current challenges and future directions. Conclusions: The majority of studies focused on the disease identification process and implemented the convolutional neural network and support vector machine techniques. The prime limitations of the investigated studies are related to the focused area, investigated SCs, the small number of experimental datasets, and validation techniques. None of the studies provided complete evidence to determine an optimal ML technique for SC to build classification or predictive models. Therefore, further concern is required to develop and improve the developed solutions including other ML techniques, large datasets, and advanced evaluation processes.

Indexed as

cell classificationcomputational cell biologydiagnosisMachine learning (ML)stem cell (SC)

Identifiers

PMID38911568
PMCPMC11193562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.