ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Current status of pathogen handling in European laboratories: focus on viral inactivation process.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development, Characterization, and Validation of an MS2 Phage-Based Armored RNA Control for Schmallenberg Virus Detection.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Harnessing Hazara Virus as a Surrogate for Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Enables Inactivation Studies at a Low Biosafety Level.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For handling safely infectious agents, European laboratories must comply with specific EC Directives, national regulations and recommendations from the World Health Organization (WHO). To prevent laboratory acquired infections (LAIs) and pathogens dissemination, a key biosafety rule requires that any infectious material (clinical specimens or research samples) manipulated outside a biosafety cabinet (BSC) must be inactivated unless the lack of infectivity is proven. This inactivation process is a crucial step for biosafety and must be guided by a rigorous experimental qualification and validation procedure. However, for diagnostic or research laboratories, this process is not harmonized with common standard operation procedures (SOPs) but based on individual risk assessment and general international guidelines which can pose problems in emergency situations such as major outbreaks or pandemics. This review focuses on viral inactivation method, outlining the current regulatory framework, its limitations and a number of ways in which biosafety can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.