Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911512›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in rare disease

Patient-advocate-led global coalition adapting fit-for-purpose outcomes measures to assure meaningful inclusion of DEEs in clinical trials.

JayEtta Hecker, Gabrielle Conecker, Chere Chapman, Rebecca Hommer, Natasha N Ludwig, Gunes Sevinc, Sara Te, Mary Wojnaroski, Jenny Downs, Anne T Berg

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in rare disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Caregiver-reported quality of life in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Parent/caregiver perspectives of meaningful improvement in functional domains for people with CDKL5 deficiency disorder: a mixed-methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

JayEtta HeckerDEE-P Connections, a project of Decoding Developmental Epilepsies, 1234 Crittenden St NW, Washington, DC 20011, USA.
Gabrielle ConeckerDEE-P Connections, a project of Decoding Developmental Epilepsies, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3274-0292
Chere ChapmanArdea Outcomes, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rebecca HommerMaryland Deaf and Blind Project, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Natasha N LudwigKennedy-Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gunes SevincArdea Outcomes, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sara TeDEE-P Connections, a project of Decoding Developmental Epilepsies, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary WojnaroskiNationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Jenny DownsTelethon Kids Institute Centre for Child Health Research, Perth, WA, Australia.
Anne T BergFeinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing clinical tools that measure non-seizure outcomes lack the range and granularity needed to capture skills in developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE)-affected individuals who also fall in the severe to profound range of intellectual disability. This effectively excludes those with severe impairments from clinical trials, impeding the ability of sponsors to evaluate disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The Inchstone Project, an international, patient advocate-led collaboration, brings together leading researchers, clinicians, pharmaceutical companies, and advocates to develop an adapted, validated assessment battery within 5 years. The goal is to support trials of DMTs for the DEEs by providing sufficiently sensitive measurement tools to demonstrate therapeutic efficacy. An initial pilot study administered 7 established assessments to 10 individuals affected by SCN2A-DEE, identifying specific limitations of existing measures and areas for improvement. It was clear that most tools do not account for challenges throughout the DEE population, including vision impairments, significant motor impairments and profound intellectual disability, which need to be accounted for in creating a 'fit-for-purpose' battery for the DEE population. Several novel assessments, including two measures of responsivity developed for use in monitoring recovery after acquired brain injury as well as individualized Goal Attainment Scaling, showed promise in this group. The team also completed a DEE-wide survey with over 270 caregivers documenting their children's abilities and priorities for their improvement from new treatments. The Inchstone team is using this information to evaluate how existing tools might be updated to better capture what is most important to families and measure their child's small but important improvements over time. These efforts are building a coherent picture across multiple DEEs of what domains, or concepts of interest, have the greatest impact on most patients and families. The Inchstone team is on course to adapt non-seizure outcome measures that are (1) sufficiently sensitive to measure small increments of meaningful change ('Inchstones') and (2) applicable to multiple DEE conditions.

Indexed as

clinical outcome assessmentsconcept of interestcortical visual impairmentdisease-modifying therapiesfit-for-purposeinchstonesmeaningful changepatient-focused drug development

Identifiers

PMID38911512
PMCPMC11193340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.