ArticleNature and science of sleep2024
Diagnosing OSA and Insomnia at Home Based Only on an Actigraphy Total Sleep Time and RIP Belts an Algorithm "Nox Body Sleep™".
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redefining telemedicine in obstructive sleep apnea management through artificial intelligence.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced clinical sleep protocols with stricter hospital disinfection requirements. Facing these new rules, we tested if a new artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm: The Nox BodySleep™ (NBS) developed without airflow signals for the analysis of sleep might assess pertinently sleep in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) and chronic insomnia (CI) as a control group, compared to polysomnography (PSG) manual scoring. Patients-Methods: NBS is a recurrent neural network model that estimates Wake, NREM, and REM states, given features extracted from activity and respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) belt signals (Nox A1 PSG). Sleep states from 139 PSG studies (CI N = 72; OSA N = 67) were analyzed by NBS and compared to manually scored PSG using positive percentage agreement, negative percentage agreement, and overall agreement metrics. Similarly, we compared common sleep parameters and OSA severity using sleep states estimated by NBS for each recording and compared to manual scoring using Bland-Altman analysis and intra-class correlation coefficient. Results: For 127,170 sleep epochs, an overall agreement of 83% was reached for Wake, NREM and REM states (92% for REM states in CI patients) between NBS and manually scored PSG. Overall agreement for estimating OSA severity was 100% for moderate-severe OSA and 91% for minimal OSA. The absolute errors of the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and total sleep time (TST) were significantly lower for the NBS compared to no scoring of sleep. The intra-class correlation was higher for AHI and significantly higher for TST using the NBS compared to no scoring of sleep. Conclusion: NBS gives sleep states, parameters and AHI with a good positive and negative percentage agreement, compared with manually scored PSG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.