Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911289›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2024

Social cohesion among healthcare workers during COVID-19: Qualitative research in Indonesia, Nepal, and Vietnam.

Ha Nguyen Thanh, Ida Ayu Sutrisni, Samita Rijal, Aakriti Pandey, Thao Phuong Tran, Ragil Dien, Yen Nguyen Thi Hong, Diana Timoria, Dewi Friska, Aria Kekalih and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Social Cohesion and COVID-19: Integrative Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ha Nguyen ThanhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Ida Ayu SutrisniOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Samita RijalOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Aakriti PandeyOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Thao Phuong TranOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Ragil DienOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Yen Nguyen Thi HongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Diana TimoriaOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Dewi FriskaDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Aria KekalihDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Claus BoghSumba Foundation, Sumba, Indonesia.
Abhilasha KarkeyOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Raph L HamersOxford University Clinical Research Unit Indonesia, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mary ChambersOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Sonia LewyckaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hanoi, Viet Nam.
Jennifer Ilo Van NuilOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing literature has portrayed numerous challenges that healthcare workers (HCWs) faced during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as heightened risks of transmission against the scarcity of protective equipment, burgeoning workload, and emotional distress, to name a few. However, most studies explored HCWs' experiences at the individual level rather than examining the collective responses. Exploring these experiences could reveal the social-cultural locality of the pandemic while identifying the system constraints in public health emergencies. As part of a mixed-method study on COVID-19 pandemic impacts, we analysed qualitative interview data with 129 HCWs and health-related staff to explore their experiences during the pandemic between 2020 and 2021 in Vietnam, Indonesia, and Nepal. Using Bahers' sociological framework, Community of Fate, we describe five themes reflecting the formation of a community of HCWs and the social cohesion underlying their efforts to survive hardship. The first three themes characterise the HCW community of fate, including (1) Recognition of extreme work-related danger, (2) physical and figurative closures where HCWs restrict themselves from the outside world, (3) chronic ordeals with overwhelming workload and responsibilities, encompassing recurrent mental health challenges. Against such extreme hardship, cohesive bonding and social resilience are reflected through two additional themes: (4) a mutual sense of moral and professional duty to protect communities, (5) the vertical and horizontal convergence among HCWs across levels and among government departments. We discuss these HCWs' challenges in relation to systemic vulnerabilities while advocating for increasing investment in public health and collaboration across government sectors to prepare for emergency situations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Healthcare workersIndonesiaNepalQualitativeSocial cohesionVietnam

Identifiers

PMID38911289
PMCPMC11190837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.