Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911161›Full record

ArticleRSC medicinal chemistry2024

Identification of fragments targeting SMYD3 using highly sensitive kinetic and multiplexed biosensor-based screening.

Edward A FitzGerald, Daniela Cederfelt, Bjarte Aarmo Lund, Nadine E M Myers, He Zhang, Doreen Dobritzsch, U Helena Danielson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC medicinal chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Target Engagement Assays in Early Drug Discovery.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edward A FitzGeraldDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-1241
Daniela CederfeltDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.
Bjarte Aarmo LundDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9141-0555
Nadine E M MyersDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3440-2662
He ZhangDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.
Doreen DobritzschDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.
U Helena DanielsonDepartment of Chemistry - BMC, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden helena.danielson@kemi.uu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2728-0340

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 1056-membered fragment library has been screened against SMYD3 using a novel multiplexed experimental design implemented in a grating coupled interferometry (GCI)-based biosensor. SMYD3 is a prospective target for anticancer drugs and the focus has initially been on discovery of inhibitors of its lysine methyl transferase activity. However, it has multiple protein interaction partners and several potential roles in carcinogenesis. It therefore remains unclear what mode of action ligands targeting the protein should have. Our goal was therefore to identify new ligands and discriminate hits that interact with the active site and those that interact with other sites. In addition, we were interested in selecting hits based on kinetic features rather than affinity. Screening was done in parallel against SMYD3 alone or SMYD3 with the active site blocked by a tight binding inhibitor. Hit selection was primarily based on dissociation rates. In total, 20 fragments were selected as hits, of which half apparently targeted the active site and half targeted other sites. Twelve of the hits were selected for structural analysis using X-ray crystallography in order to identify binding sites and modes of binding. Four of the hits were successfully identified in crystal structures with SMYD3; the others did not show any electron densities for ligands in the crystals. Although it might be possible to optimize the crystallography approach for a better success rate, it was clear that the sensitivity and time resolution of the biosensor assay was exceptional and enabled kinetic rate constants to be estimated for fragments. Fragments are typically considered to interact too rapidly for such quantification to be possible. This approach consequently represents a paradigm shift. In addition, the multiplexed approach allows ligands targeting different sites to be rationally selected already in the fragment library screening stage.

Identifiers

PMID38911161
PMCPMC11187542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.