ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
Pragmatic Evaluation of Growth Hormone Stimulation Tests in Short Stature.
Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of First-Year Growth Velocity Response to Growth Hormone Therapy in Patients with Growth Hormone Deficiency.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To assess the performance of growth hormone stimulation tests (GHSTs) in the evaluation of short stature. Methods: It was a single-centre retrospective study carried out in children evaluated for short stature between January 2005 to March 2020. The clonidine stimulation test (CST) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) were used to assess growth hormone (GH) reserve (GST was performed only when peak GH levels were between 5 to ≤10 ng/mL on CST). A GH level of <5 ng/mL on CST or ≤10 ng/ml on both was used to corroborate GH deficiency. Results: A total of 556 children were eligible for this study. The mean (SD) age was 12.9 (3.5) years, and 66.3% were male. The peak GH level [median (IQR)] was 5.50 ng/ml (1.90 - 7.50) on CST (at 60 minutes) and 7.45 ng/ml (2.15 - 10.77) on GST (at 120 minutes). On restricting sampling to two time points, the false positive rate was 13.6% on CST (60, 90 minutes) and 11.5% on GST (120, 150 minutes). Similarly, restricting to three time points was associated with a false positive rate of 8.5% on CST (60, 90, 120 minutes) and 3.8% on GST (90, 120, 150 minutes). Using the treating clinician-determined diagnosis of GHD as a reference standard, the optimal cut-off of peak GH on CST was 7.79 ng/ml (sensitivity: 83.8%; specificity: 89.4%). Conclusion: Restricting the GH sampling to fewer time points is associated with an increase in the false positivity rate (FPR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.