Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911107›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of endocrinology and metabolism

Pragmatic Evaluation of Growth Hormone Stimulation Tests in Short Stature.

Rahul Gupta, Aashima Dabas, Shweta Kohli, Rekha Ramot, Viveka P Jyotsna, Alpesh Goyal, Yashdeep Gupta, Rajesh Khadgawat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rahul GuptaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Aashima DabasDepartment of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Shweta KohliDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rekha RamotDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Viveka P JyotsnaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Alpesh GoyalDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Yashdeep GuptaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajesh KhadgawatDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To assess the performance of growth hormone stimulation tests (GHSTs) in the evaluation of short stature. Methods: It was a single-centre retrospective study carried out in children evaluated for short stature between January 2005 to March 2020. The clonidine stimulation test (CST) and glucagon stimulation test (GST) were used to assess growth hormone (GH) reserve (GST was performed only when peak GH levels were between 5 to ≤10 ng/mL on CST). A GH level of <5 ng/mL on CST or ≤10 ng/ml on both was used to corroborate GH deficiency. Results: A total of 556 children were eligible for this study. The mean (SD) age was 12.9 (3.5) years, and 66.3% were male. The peak GH level [median (IQR)] was 5.50 ng/ml (1.90 - 7.50) on CST (at 60 minutes) and 7.45 ng/ml (2.15 - 10.77) on GST (at 120 minutes). On restricting sampling to two time points, the false positive rate was 13.6% on CST (60, 90 minutes) and 11.5% on GST (120, 150 minutes). Similarly, restricting to three time points was associated with a false positive rate of 8.5% on CST (60, 90, 120 minutes) and 3.8% on GST (90, 120, 150 minutes). Using the treating clinician-determined diagnosis of GHD as a reference standard, the optimal cut-off of peak GH on CST was 7.79 ng/ml (sensitivity: 83.8%; specificity: 89.4%). Conclusion: Restricting the GH sampling to fewer time points is associated with an increase in the false positivity rate (FPR).

Indexed as

Diagnosisgrowthgrowth hormone stimulation testshort stature

Identifiers

PMID38911107
PMCPMC11189287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.