Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911084›Full record

ReviewVeterinary world2024

Modulation of chicken gut microbiota for enhanced productivity and health: A review.

Himmatul Khasanah, Dwi E Kusbianto, Listya Purnamasari, Joseph F Dela Cruz, Desy C Widianingrum, Seong Gu Hwang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Himmatul KhasanahStudy Program of Animal Husbandry University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia.
Dwi E KusbiantoStudy Program of Agricultural Science, University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia.
Listya PurnamasariStudy Program of Animal Husbandry University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia.
Joseph F Dela CruzDepartment of Basic Veterinary Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Los Baños-4031, Philippines.
Desy C WidianingrumStudy Program of Animal Husbandry University of Jember, Jember 68121, Indonesia.
Seong Gu HwangSchool of Animal Life Convergence Science, Hankyong National University, Anseong 17579, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiota in the digestive tract has become an interesting topic for researchers in recent years. The profile of chicken digestive tract microbiota and its relationship with health and production efficiency have become basic data for modulating the diversity and abundance of the digestive tract microbiota. This article reviews the techniques used to analyze the diversity, role, and function of the gastrointestinal microbiota and the mechanisms by which they are modulated. The gut microbiota plays an important role in animal production, especially during feed digestion and animal health, because it interacts with the host against pathogens. Feed modulation can be a strategy to modulate gut composition and diversity to increase production efficiency by improving growth conditions.

Indexed as

feed additivemetagenomephytogenicpoultry productionprebioticprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID38911084
PMCPMC11188898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.