Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38911076›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2024

Identification of novel probiotic lactic acid bacteria from soymilk waste using the 16s rRNA gene for potential use in poultry.

Anifah Srifani, Mirnawati Mirnawati, Yetti Marlida, Yose Rizal, Nurmiati Nurmiati, Kyung-Woo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Veterinary world · 2026
    Article
  5. Synergistic probiotic consortium ofVeterinary world · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anifah SrifaniPMDSU Program, Graduate Program of Animal Feed and Nutrition Department, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Mirnawati MirnawatiDepartment of Animal Feed and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Yetti MarlidaDepartment of Animal Feed and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Yose RizalDepartment of Animal Feed and Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Nurmiati NurmiatiDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Andalas, Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia.
Kyung-Woo LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: In-feed antibiotics have been used as antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) to enhance the genetic potential of poultry. However, the long-term use of AGPs is known to lead to bacterial resistance and antibiotic residues in poultry meat and eggs. To address these concerns, alternatives to AGPs are needed, one of which is probiotics, which can promote the health of livestock without having any negative effects. Materials and Methods: Four LAB isolates (designated F4, F6, F9, and F11) isolated from soymilk waste were used in this study. Result: All LAB isolates used in this study have the potential to be used as probiotics. On the basis of the results of Conclusion: All isolates in this study have the potential to be used as probiotics. However, isolate F4 has the best probiotic properties and is considered to be the most promising novel probiotic for poultry.

Indexed as

lactic acid bacteriapoultryprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID38911076
PMCPMC11188893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.