ArticleEndoscopy international open2024
A new through-the-scope clip with anchor prongs is safe and successful for a variety of endoscopic uses.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Initial non-surgical versus upfront surgical management of ERCP-related perforations by Stapfer type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Defect Closure Techniques After Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Large Colon Polyps.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Reported adverse events of the anchor prong clip: a MAUDE database analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic clip systems for hemostasis and defect closure in gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
- Rectal Impaction of a Migratory Duck Bone After 72 Asymptomatic Hours: A Defused Time Bomb.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Reduced migration of esophageal fully covered self-expandable metal stents affixed with clips with anchor prongs.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.