ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024
Comparison of Conventional Incision and 10 mm Approach for Volar Locking Plates in Dorsal Displaced Distal Radius Fractures.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery with a 10 mm approach for volar locking plate fixation provides equivalent early post-operative outcomes to conventional incision surgery for distal radius fractures. Materials and Methods: The subjects were divided into a conventional incision group (mean age: 59.1 years, 8 males and 23 females) and a 10 mm approach group (mean age: 59.9 years of age, 6 males and 20 females). The wrist range of motion; grip strength; visual analog scale (VAS); quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (Q-DASH) score; and modified Mayo score were assessed at 3 months after surgery. In addition, radial inclination, ulnar variance, and volar tilt were evaluated on post-operative radiography. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in the wrist range of motion, grip strength, VAS, Q-DASH score, modified Mayo wrist score, and three parameters of post-operative radiography. All patients in both groups had no complications during the perioperative period. Conclusion: We found that a 10 mm approach obtained early post-operative outcomes and alignment comparable to conventional incision surgery for patients with dorsal displaced distal radius fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.