ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2024
Primary Total Knee Replacement using Rotating Hinge Implants in Poliomyelitis: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Paralytic Knee Arthropathy Following Spinal Ependymoma Resection Treated With Bilateral Hinged Total Knee Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of standard primary vs. primary rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched-pair analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The results of primary total knee replacement (TKR) using hinge implants performed in the Indian population with post-polio residual paresis (PPRP) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to report the outcome of primary rotating hinge TKR in Indian patients with PPRP at a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological records of six patients treated with primary rotating hinge TKR. Pre-and post-operative (at final follow-up) knee range of motion (ROM), knee sagittal deformity, knee society score (KSS), and Oxford knee score (OKS) were compared to determine improvement in function. Results: Six rotating hinge TKRs (five female and one male patient) were analyzed for this study. At a mean follow-up of 27 ± 22 months (range, 12-71 months), the mean pre-operative KSS of 50.6 ± 2.5 significantly improved (P < 0.0001) to 72.5 ± 1.6, and the mean pre-operative OKS of 23.6 ± 1.6 significantly improved (P < 0.0001) to 35.3 ± 1.7. The mean pre-operative knee ROM of 94° ± 10° changed to 92° ± 4° (P = 0.64) and the mean pre-operative sagittal deformity of 7° ± 23.5° changed to -3° ± 2.5° (P = 0.32) at final follow-up. None of the knees had any intra- or post-operative complications or showed radiologic evidence of post-operative loosening, subsidence, or periprosthetic radiolucent lines at the final follow-up. Conclusion: Rotating hinge TKR gave excellent clinical and radiological results at a mean follow-up of 27 months in the present study. Despite TKR being a technically challenging procedure in patients with poliomyelitis-affected limbs, a rotating hinge design, along with meticulous surgical technique, can significantly improve function in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.