ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024
Security Risk Assessment for Patient Portals of Hospitals: A Case Study of Taiwan.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safeguarding patient privacy in eHealth systems: Bridging theory and practice through a scoping review and healthcare survey.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Growing cyberattacks have made it more challenging to maintain healthcare information system (HIS) security in medical institutes, especially for hospitals that provide patient portals to access patient information, such as electronic health record (EHR). Objective: This work aims to evaluate the patient portal security risk of Taiwan's EEC (EMR Exchange Center) member hospitals and analyze the association between patient portal security, hospital location, contract category and hospital type. Methods: We first collected the basic information of EEC member hospitals, including hospital location, contract category and hospital type. Then, the patient portal security of individual hospitals was evaluated by a well-known vulnerability scanner, UPGUARD, to assess website if vulnerable to high-level attacks such as denial of service attacks or ransomware attacks. Based on their UPSCAN scores, hospitals were classified into four security ratings: absolute low risk, low to medium risk, medium to high risk and high risk. Finally, the associations between security rating, contract category and hospital type were analyzed using chi-square tests. Results: We surveyed a total of 373 EEC member hospitals. Among them, 20 hospital patient portals were rated as "absolute low risk", 104 hospital patient portals as "low to medium risk", 99 hospital patient portals as "medium to high risk" and 150 hospital patient portals as "high risk". Further investigation revealed that the patient portal security of EEC member hospitals was significantly associated with the contract category and hospital type ( Conclusion: The analysis results showed that large-scale hospitals generally had higher security levels, implying that the security of low-tier and small-scale hospitals may warrant reinforcement or strengthening. We suggest that hospitals should pay attention to the security risk assessment of their patient portals to preserve patient information privacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.