Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910842›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2024

Responding to structural inequities: Coping strategies among immigrant women during COVID-19.

Tara F Abularrage, Heather M Wurtz, Goleen Samari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of marriage and the family · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Medical anthropology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tara F AbularrageHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Heather M WurtzAnthropology Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Goleen SamariHeilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jennifer S Hirsch, Julien O Teitler · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
GSH Training GrantT32HD049339 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jennifer S Hirsch · 2006 to 2026
$3.4M
Migration, Dynamic Social Environments, and Birth OutcomesK01HD103879 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SAMARI, GOLEEN · 2021 to 2025
$669k
NICHD NIH HHS K01 HD103879NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examining coping strategies and resilience among immigrant communities reflects a commitment to working with immigrant communities to understand their needs while also identifying and building upon their strengths. In the United States, the physical, emotional, and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic intersected with existing structural inequities to produce distinct challenges and stressors related to the pandemic, immigration, caregiving responsibilities, and structural xenophobia. Leveraging an understanding of the multilevel effects of stress, this qualitative study explores individual, interpersonal, and community-level coping strategies immigrant women used to respond to, alleviate, or reduce distress related to these compounding stressors. Using semi-structured in-depth interviews conducted in 2020 and 2021 with 44 first- and second-generation cisgender immigrant women from different national origins and 19 direct service providers serving immigrant communities in New York City, data were coded and analyzed using a constant comparative approach. Four central themes were identified: caregiving as a source of strength, leveraging resources, social connections, and community support. While women described a range of coping strategies they used to manage stressors and challenges, perspectives from direct service providers also connect these coping strategies to the harm-generating institutions, policies, and structures that produce and uphold structural oppression and inequities. Accounts from service providers point to the detrimental long-term effects of prolonged coping, underscoring a duality between resilience and vulnerability. Exploring the coping strategies cisgender immigrant women used to ease distress and promote resilience during a period of heightened structural vulnerability is critical to centering the experiences of immigrant women while simultaneously directing attention towards addressing the fundamental causes of cumulative disadvantage and the systems and structures through which it is transmitted.

Indexed as

CopingCOVID-19GenderImmigrantsStructural inequitiesStructural racism

Identifiers

PMID38910842
PMCPMC11192517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.