ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Fast digitally reconstructed radiograph generation using particle-based statistical shape and intensity model.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Statistical shape and intensity models (SSIMs) and digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were introduced for non-rigid 2D-3D registration and skeletal geometry/density reconstruction studies. The computation of DRRs takes most of the time during registration or reconstruction. The goal of this study is to propose a particle-based method for composing an SSIM and a DRR image generation scheme and analyze the quality of the images compared with previous DRR generation methods. Approach: Particle-based SSIMs consist of densely scattered particles on the surface and inside of an object, with each particle having an intensity value. Generating the DRR resembles ray tracing, which counts the particles that are binned with each ray and calculates the radiation attenuation. The distance between adjacent particles was considered to be the radiologic path during attenuation integration, and the mean linear attenuation coefficient of the two particles was multiplied. The proposed method was compared with the DRR of CT projection. The mean squared error and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated between the DRR images from the proposed method and those of existing methods of projecting tetrahedral-based SSIMs or computed tomography (CT) images to verify the accuracy of the proposed scheme. Results: The suggested method was about 600 times faster than the tetrahedral-based SSIM without using the hardware acceleration technique. The PSNR was 37.59 dB, and the root mean squared error of the normalized pixel intensities was 0.0136. Conclusions: The proposed SSIM and DRR generation procedure showed high temporal performance while maintaining image quality, and particle-based SSIM is a feasible form for representing a 3D volume and generating the DRR images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.