ReviewCureus2024
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroendocrine Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and transforming cancer care.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in non-small cell lung cancer: the current state of the science on multi-omic applications.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with diverse clinical presentations and prognoses. Accurate and timely diagnosis of these tumors is crucial for appropriate management and improved patient outcomes. In recent years, exciting advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have been revolutionizing medical diagnostics, particularly in the realm of detecting and characterizing pulmonary NETs, offering promising avenues for improved patient care. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of AI in diagnosing lung NETs. We discuss the current challenges associated with conventional diagnostic approaches, including histopathological examination and imaging modalities. Despite advancements in these techniques, accurate diagnosis remains challenging due to the overlapping features with other pulmonary lesions and the subjective interpretation of imaging findings. AI-based approaches, including machine learning and deep learning algorithms, have demonstrated remarkable potential in addressing these challenges. By leveraging large datasets of radiological images, histopathological samples, and clinical data, AI models can extract complex patterns and features that may not be readily discernible to human observers. Moreover, AI algorithms can continuously learn and improve from new data, leading to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency over time. Specific AI applications in the diagnosis of lung NETs include computer-aided detection and classification of pulmonary nodules on CT scans, quantitative analysis of PET imaging for tumor characterization, and integration of multi-modal data for comprehensive diagnostic assessments. These AI-driven tools hold promise for facilitating early detection, risk stratification, and personalized treatment planning in patients with lung NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.