Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910762›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases.

Ananya Reddy Cingireddy, Brianna Flores, John Wuthrich, Anirudh Reddy Cingireddy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ananya Reddy CingireddyInternal Medicine, Mountain View Regional Medical Center, Las Cruces, USA.
Brianna FloresInternal Medicine, Mountain View Regional Medical Center, Las Cruces, USA.
John WuthrichInternal Medicine, Mountain View Regional Medical Center, Las Cruces, USA.
Anirudh Reddy CingireddyComputer Science, East Central University, Ada, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A small number of drugs have been the sole stay of conventional treatment for autoimmune illnesses for the past 10 years. These medications have a number of side effects that restrict their usage and necessitate continuous administration to keep a patient in a state of remission. While many new treatments are being researched to address this problem, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy currently shows the greatest potential. Current medical guidelines do not currently advocate the use of this medicine because it is still in its early stages of development due to continuing clinical research. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to determine what new findings have been reported in recent studies about the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cells. From the nine studies collected in total, it was found that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was the most often researched autoimmune disease. The CAR T-cell therapy had noticeable results after one to two months on average. The most frequent adverse effect was cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which was treated cautiously and infrequently necessitated extensive intervention. All serological tests showed improvement, and clinical remission was always achieved. This review concludes that, due to the one-time infusion and low adverse reaction rate, the therapy not only outperforms conventional drugs but is also more practical. There is even more cause to look forward to the full deployment of this innovative therapeutic alternative, as variations of the therapy are currently being explored.

Indexed as

car t-cell therapycd19efficacysafetysystemic autoimmune diseases

Identifiers

PMID38910762
PMCPMC11193675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.