ArticleCureus2024
An Evaluation of Minimal F-wave Sensitivity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing diagnostic accuracy in carpal tunnel syndrome: integrating the median-ulnar F-wave latency differentials with symptom severity score and katz hand diagram.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Several recent studies have explored whether F-waves can be a sensitive and useful tool for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In light of this, we aimed to measure the minimal F-wave latencies in patients with mild, moderate, and severe electrophysiologically diagnosed carpal CTS, as well as individuals without CTS, to determine at which point this parameter becomes sensitive to the syndrome. Materials and methods Nerve conduction studies were carried out in a room where a temperature of 22-24 °C was maintained. The F-waves of the median nerve in all patients and individuals in the control group were recorded. The F-wave with the highest velocity (minimal F) was categorized into the normal, mild, moderate, and severe groups for statistical analysis. All measurements were performed by the same electrophysiology-experienced neurologist. Results Post-hoc analysis demonstrated that the F latency values of the moderate and severe CTS groups were significantly higher than those of the control group (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Furthermore, the F latency values of the severe CTS group were significantly higher than those of the moderate group (p=0.026). Conclusions Based on our findings, minimal F-wave latency is a reliable indicator of moderate to severe CTS. This sensitivity significantly increases in severe cases while disappearing in the presence of mild CTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.