ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of the Effects of Hydralazine and Labetalol on Intracranial Pressure When Used for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Recommendations on optimal agents to manage blood pressure (BP) in patients with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are lacking. A case series suggests that hydralazine can cause intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation in an ICH. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous (IV) hydralazine to IV labetalol on ICP in patients with ICH. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review from September 2015 to September 2021 on adults admitted to a level I trauma center with ICH, requiring an external ventricular drain or ICP monitor, and pharmacologic intervention with IV hydralazine or IV labetalol. ICP measurements and clinical interventions 0-80 minutes prior to and after medication administration were compared. Data points were excluded if multiple antihypertensive agents were administered. Results A total of 27 patients were included (three received only hydralazine, 13 only labetalol, and 11 both). Twenty-seven doses of hydralazine and 115 doses of labetalol were compared. There was no significant difference in mean ICP 0-80 minutes following hydralazine and labetalol administration (p = 0.283). Of the hydralazine doses, 29.6% received intervention for elevated ICP, while 25.2% of labetalol doses received intervention (p = 0.633). Hydralazine patients received m = 0.56 interventions for ICP, and labetalol patients received m = 0.36 interventions (p = 0.223). Of the patients that required intervention for ICP management, hydralazine patients required m = 1.88 interventions, while labetalol patients required m = 1.41 interventions (p = 0.115). Conclusion There was no significant difference in mean ICP at 0-80 minutes following administration of hydralazine or labetalol. There was also no significant difference in interventions required for elevated ICP management between groups. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.