ArticleCureus2024
Intramyocardial Bridging: An Overlooked Cause of Atypical Chest Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramyocardial bridging (IMB) is a congenital anomaly characterized by the tunneling of a coronary artery segment through the myocardium, potentially leading to serious cardiac complications, such as myocardial ischemia, infarction, and sudden death, challenging the traditional view of it being benign. A case involving a 42-year-old man with a seven-day history of atypical chest pain highlights the significance of considering IMB in the differential diagnosis. Despite normal troponin levels, creatine kinase (CK), CK-MB, D-dimer, a negative drug screen, a normal ECG, and chest X-ray and no apparent issues on echocardiogram, left heart catheterization revealed IMB in the left anterior descending artery. This case underscores the necessity of including IMB in the differential diagnosis for chest pain, particularly in young males with familial cardiovascular disease history. While noninvasive imaging methods are useful for diagnosis, coronary angiography is the definitive diagnostic tool. Treatment primarily involves beta-blockers and calcium-channel blockers, with revascularization as a secondary option for those unresponsive to medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.