ReviewCureus2024
Updates on the Diagnostic Use of Ultrasonography Augmented With Perfluorobutane Contrast in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a thorough search was conducted for pertinent literature using PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Wiley Library. This was a meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. MetaDiSc 1.4 was used for all analyses and assessed statistical heterogeneity with the I2 index and the chi-square test. The random-effects model was applied where there was considerable heterogeneity. Using the eight elements of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort and case-control studies, we assessed the quality of the included studies. Our results included nine studies with a total of 2598 patients, and 1607 (61.8%) were males. The pooled overall sensitivity of perfluorobutane with CEUS was 85.6% (95% CI 0.832, -0.878, and P=0.000) and specificity was 91.5% (95% CI 0.899, -0.930, and P=0.000) with significant inter heterogeneity between studies (I2=94.3% and 95.7%), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 12.42 (4.59 to 33.61, P=0.000). Our analysis revealed a symmetric summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve and seven of the included studies are near the top left corner of the graph, indicating that this test has a high diagnostic value. The results showed that CEUS augmented with perfluorobutane contrast had good diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for primary HCC. Further real-world data studies are needed to confirm the good diagnosis accuracy of perfluorobutane CEUS in primary HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.