ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Feminizing Gender Affirmation Genital Surgery: A Novel Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Gender dysphoria is treated with gender affirmation surgery (GAS) for assigned male at birth (AMAB) individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative anatomical changes in AMAB individuals who underwent GAS using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare it with cis-females, thereby assessing the efficacy of the surgical technique in achieving pelvic anatomy similar to cis-females. Methodology This was a prospective observational study done in a tertiary care hospital. AMAB individuals who underwent gender affirmation genital surgery using single-stage solely penile skin inversion vaginoplasty were included after informed consent and approval by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee. Patients with complications such as deep space surgical site infection (SSI) and neo-vaginal prolapse were excluded. All the study participants were advised a vaginal self-dilatation regimen, reviewed three months after the surgery, and subjected to an MRI of the pelvis with a vaginal tutor. Parameters such as neo-vaginal depth, alpha (α) angle, rectovaginal thickness, and remnant of corpora cavernosa were measured and compared with cis-female parameters measured from images in the archives from the Department of Radiology. Result A total of 21 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 27±4.7. Between the study group and cis-females, no significant difference was seen in vaginal depth, and cis-females had significantly higher values in other parameters. There was a significant difference between the subgroups, i.e., defaulters and non-defaulters in soft tissue parameters such as vaginal depth (p=0.001), α angle (p=0.002), and rectovaginal thickness (p=0.002) with the non-defaulter patients having higher values. Conclusion Single-stage penile skin inversion vaginoplasty is capable of producing anatomical parameters, importantly neo-vaginal depth, which is fairly comparable with cis-female, as evident in the non-defaulter subgroup patients. Proper compliance with the vaginal dilatation regimen plays a significant role in the maintenance of soft tissue pelvic anatomical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.