ReviewCurrent drug safety2025
Treatment of Tislelizumab-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Agranulocytosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Review in Current drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Two cases of pancytopenia characterized by severe neutropenia induced by anti-PD-1 tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients and a literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Tislelizumab-induced anaphylactic shock: a case report.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Case report: Multi-organ injuries induced by tislelizumab.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by tislelizumab: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Case report of acute hepatorenal failure induced by third-line treatment with tislelizumab in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma: was influenza virus the culprit?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Severe cutaneous drug toxicity following disitamab vedotin treatment for metastatic gastric cancer: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) makes up about 85% of lung cancer cases, mainly adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Recently, PD-1 inhibitors have become crucial in NSCLC treatment, significantly enhancing survival for some. However, side effects, like skin reactions and hematotoxicity, limit their use, with drug-induced TEN and immunotherapy-induced agranulocytosis as severe adverse effects. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we have reported the case of a 75-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic Lung Squamous cell Carcinoma (LUSC) in the left lung. He received first-line treatment with one cycle of tislelizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, after which he developed Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and granulocytopenia. To address these two serious immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs), the patient was administered methylprednisolone in combination with gamma globulin for TEN and dexamethasone in combination with G-CSF for agranulocytosis. Antibiotics were also administered according to the patient's medication regimen. After treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged from the hospital. It was also noted that the lung tumor condition improved.
conclusionEffective management of severe immune-related side effects from tislelizumab, including TEN and agranulocytosis, can be partly achieved through steroids, gamma globulin, GCSF, and antibiotics. This strategy not only alleviates these adverse effects, but also potentially improves tumor conditions, highlighting the crucial role of vigilant monitoring and management in immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.