Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910314›Full record

ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024

Parenting under pressure: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of psychological distress, parenting concerns, self-efficacy, and emotion regulation in parents with cancer.

Maria Romare Strandh, Pia Enebrink, Karin Stålberg, Renita Sörensdotter, Lisa Ljungman, Anna Wikman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Implementing an electronic health record workflow to identify parents with cancer and implications for supportive oncology care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria Romare StrandhDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Women's Mental Health during the Reproductive Lifespan (WOMHER), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. maria.romare.strandh@uu.se.
Pia EnebrinkDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karin StålbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Renita SörensdotterCentre for Gender Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lisa LjungmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna WikmanDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Women's Mental Health during the Reproductive Lifespan (WOMHER), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAs many as one in four adults with cancer have children under 18 years. Balancing parenting and cancer is challenging and can be a source of psychological distress. This study aimed to examine psychological distress in parents with cancer and its associations with parenting concerns, self-efficacy, and emotion regulation. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 406 parents (aged 25-60 years) diagnosed with cancer within the last 5 years, with at least one dependent child (≤ 18 years). Parents completed questionnaires on psychological distress (DASS-21), parenting concerns (PCQ), self-efficacy (GSE), emotion regulation (ERQ), mental and physical health, and sociodemographics. Data were analysed using multiple logistic regressions on depression (yes/no), anxiety (yes/no), and stress (yes/no).

resultsHigher parenting concerns were associated with greater odds of depression (OR = 2.33, 95% CI: 1.64-3.31), anxiety (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.64-3.20), and stress (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.20-4.69) when adjusting for health and sociodemographic factors. Poorer self-efficacy was associated with increased odds of anxiety (OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.99, p < 0.05), whereas lower use of cognitive reappraisal and higher use of expressive suppression increased the odds of depression (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.98 | OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.18-1.80).

interpretationThe findings highlight the complexity of parental well-being in relation to parenthood and cancer, stressing the need for interventions that address relevant psychological factors to improve overall mental health in this population.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationNeoplasmsParentingParentsPsychological DistressSelf EfficacyAdolescentAdultAnxietyChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38910314
PMCPMC11332455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.