ArticleYonsei medical journal2024
Gestational Diabetes and C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Pregnancy: A Prospective Study.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Elevated Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index is Associated with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter Retrospective Studies.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) has been reported as a novel inflammatory marker to assess inflammation. The aim of this study was to compare the levels of CAR as a inflammatory marker in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and non GDM patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsEight hundred ten pregnant women who applied to our hospital for routine antenatal screening were included in this prospective case-control study. The patients were divided into two groups, as positive and negative diagnosis of GDM. CAR between groups was compared as the primary outcome using statistical methods.
resultsThe CAR value was significantly higher in pregnancies with GDM compared to healthy controls [1.07 (0.43-1.89) vs. 0.37 (0.12-0.68),
conclusionConsidering that laboratory testing is very simple and inexpensive, CAR is an independent predictor that is clinically easy to use for the development of GDM. This report is the first to show the role of CAR in GDM. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to generalize this comment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.