Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910303›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2024

Robotic Single-Site Plus One-Port Myomectomy versus Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Su Hyeon Choi, Seyeon Won, Nara Lee, So Hyun Shim, Mi Kyoung Kim, Mi-La Kim, Yong Wook Jung, Bo Seong Yun, Hye Sun Jun, Seok Ju Seong

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Su Hyeon ChoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1433-2690
Seyeon WonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2254-2703
Nara LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9019-5301
So Hyun ShimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7864-2853
Mi Kyoung KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-2339
Mi-La KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-5664
Yong Wook JungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-8143
Bo Seong YunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4352-1693
Hye Sun JunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5758-4452
Seok Ju SeongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sjseongcheil@naver.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3820-3412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobotic single-site plus one-port myomectomy (RSOM) was designed to reduce the number of incision sites for greater cosmetic satisfaction of patients while retaining the benefits of conventional robotic multi-site myomectomy (CRM). Robotic single-site plus two-port myomectomy (RSTM) eliminated one port relative to conventional CRM, and RSOM achieved the same advantage with respect to RSTM. This study aimed to compare RSOM with RSTM in terms of their respective methodologies and surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe medical records of 230 patients who had undergone RSOM and 146 patients who had undergone RSTM were reviewed. The groups' surgical outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.

resultsIn the total data, RSOM had a shorter operative time (135.1±57.4 min vs. 149.9±46.2 min,

conclusionCompared with RSTM, RSOM was associated with shorter operative time. Additionally, more detailed comparative and prospective studies are needed to evaluate RSOM relative to RSTM.

Indexed as

Operative TimePropensity ScoreRobotic Surgical ProceduresUterine MyomectomyAdultFemaleHumansLeiomyomaLength of StayMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUterine Neoplasmslaparoscopyrobotic surgical proceduresuterine fibroidsUterine myomectomy

Identifiers

PMID38910303
PMCPMC11199179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.