Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910234›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

The rise and fall of a social support intervention feasibility trial targeting loneliness in patients with cardiac disease - lessons learned and future perspectives.

Mitti Blakoe, Cathrine S Olesen, Anne Vinggaard Christensen, Pernille Palm, Ida Elisabeth Hoejskov, Selina Kikkenborg Berg

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05503810 (Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05503810 naterminatednot on this map

Feasibility Randomized Trial of a Social Support Intervention Plus Usual Care Versus Usual Care, Targeting Patients Treated for Cardiac Disease Who Experience Loneliness

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2022 to 2023Enrolled4ConditionsFeasibilityArmsSocial support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mitti BlakoeThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. mitti.blakoe@regionh.dk.
Cathrine S OlesenThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Vinggaard ChristensenThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pernille PalmThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth HoejskovThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Selina Kikkenborg BergThe Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the psychosocial factors recognized for its positive impact on health outcomes among patients with heart disease, is social support provided by network members. However, an increasing number of patients report to experience loneliness. This study addresses the gap in research on the feasibility of an individually structured social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness.

methodA feasibility trial of a 6-month social support intervention targeted patients treated for cardiac disease who experienced loneliness. The intervention involved providing the patient with an informal caregiver, either a person from the patient's social network or a peer, in the long-term rehabilitation phase. Furthermore, the intervention included nurse consultations and motivational text messages. Feasibility was assessed in terms of acceptability and adherence.

resultsDuring October 2022-July 2023, n = 464 patients were screened for loneliness and 28 (6.0%) screened positive of which 17 (60.7%) accepted to be contacted and receive additional information about the social support intervention. Of these, 2 (11.8%) accepted participation. The low recruitment rate did not meet the predetermined acceptability criterion of 25%.

conclusionThis individually structured social support intervention targeting patients treated for cardiac disease who experience loneliness was non-feasible. The study highlights the complexities of engaging lonely patients in a social support intervention program and contributes with valuable insights for future research aiming to develop effective social support interventions tailored to the needs of cardiac patients who experience loneliness.

trial registrationThe trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05503810) 18.08.2022.

Indexed as

CardiacClinical nursingFeasibilityInterventionLonelinessSocial support

Identifiers

PMID38910234
PMCPMC11194936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.