Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38910188›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

The metal cofactor: stationary or mobile?

Peter-Leon Hagedoorn, Martin Pabst, Ulf Hanefeld

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter-Leon HagedoornAfdeling Biotechnologie, Technische Universiteit Delft, Van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6342-2022
Martin PabstAfdeling Biotechnologie, Technische Universiteit Delft, Van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-0723
Ulf HanefeldAfdeling Biotechnologie, Technische Universiteit Delft, Van der Maasweg 9, Delft, 2629 HZ, The Netherlands. u.hanefeld@tudelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4102-6165

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal cofactors are essential for catalysis and enable countless conversions in nature. Interestingly, the metal cofactor is not always static but mobile with movements of more than 4 Å. These movements of the metal can have different functions. In the case of the xylose isomerase and medium-chain dehydrogenases, it clearly serves a catalytic purpose. The metal cofactor moves during substrate activation and even during the catalytic turnover. On the other hand, in class II aldolases, the enzymes display resting states and active states depending on the movement of the catalytic metal cofactor. This movement is caused by substrate docking, causing the metal cofactor to take the position essential for catalysis. As these metal movements are found in structurally and mechanistically unrelated enzymes, it has to be expected that this metal movement is more common than currently perceived. KEY POINTS: • Metal ions are essential cofactors that can move during catalysis. • In class II aldolases, the metal cofactors can reside in a resting state and an active state. • In MDR, the movement of the metal cofactor is essential for substrate docking.

Indexed as

CoenzymesMetalsAldose-Ketose IsomerasesCatalysisOxidoreductasesAldose-Ketose IsomerasesCoenzymesMetalsOxidoreductasesxylose isomeraseClass II aldolaseMedium-chain dehydrogenaseMetal cofactorMetal movementXylose isomerase

Identifiers

PMID38910188
PMCPMC11194214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.