ArticleScientific reports2024
A machine learning approach for vocal fold segmentation and disorder classification based on ensemble method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laryngeal Anatomy and Morphometry: Foundations for Interdisciplinary Collaboration and Personalized Management of Laryngeal Pathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Class-Wise Deep Ensemble Framework Using ResNet101 and DenseNet201 for Brain Tumor Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Domain-robust vision transformer with hierarchical swin encoding for explainable low-latency driver drowsiness detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning model for multimodal vocal and lung signal analysis in health monitoring.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Videomics and artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnosis of laryngeal lesions: mapping current evidence through a scoping review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026Review
- Ensemble transformer with post-hoc explanations for depression emotion and severity detection.iScience · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Real-Time Automated Vocal Fold Motion Tracking for In-Office Laryngoscopy.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- A novel deep neural architecture for efficient and scalable multidomain image classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Laryngovibrogram as a normalized spatiotemporal representation of vocal fold dynamics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical nasal endoscopy, optical biopsy, and artificial intelligence in early diagnosis and treatment planning in laryngeal cancer: a prospective observational study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A reinforcement learning approach for reducing traffic congestion using deep Q learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Explainable AI-driven hybrid deep learning framework for accurate skin cancer diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the healthcare domain, the essential task is to understand and classify diseases affecting the vocal folds (VFs). The accurate identification of VF disease is the key issue in this domain. Integrating VF segmentation and disease classification into a single system is challenging but important for precise diagnostics. Our study addresses this challenge by combining VF illness categorization and VF segmentation into a single integrated system. We utilized two effective ensemble machine learning methods: ensemble EfficientNetV2L-LGBM and ensemble UNet-BiGRU. We utilized the EfficientNetV2L-LGBM model for classification, achieving a training accuracy of 98.88%, validation accuracy of 97.73%, and test accuracy of 97.88%. These exceptional outcomes highlight the system's ability to classify different VF illnesses precisely. In addition, we utilized the UNet-BiGRU model for segmentation, which attained a training accuracy of 92.55%, a validation accuracy of 89.87%, and a significant test accuracy of 91.47%. In the segmentation task, we examined some methods to improve our ability to divide data into segments, resulting in a testing accuracy score of 91.99% and an Intersection over Union (IOU) of 87.46%. These measures demonstrate skill of the model in accurately defining and separating VF. Our system's classification and segmentation results confirm its capacity to effectively identify and segment VF disorders, representing a significant advancement in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and healthcare in this specialized field. This study emphasizes the potential of machine learning to transform the medical field's capacity to categorize VF and segment VF, providing clinicians with a vital instrument to mitigate the profound impact of the condition. Implementing this innovative approach is expected to enhance medical procedures and provide a sense of optimism to those globally affected by VF disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.