Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38909641›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2025

Selective utilization of circulating tumor DNA testing enables disease monitoring in endometrial and ovarian carcinomas.

Amy Jamieson, Melissa K McConechy, Amy Lum, Janine Senz, Tanner Dowhy, David G Huntsman, Jessica N McAlpine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy JamiesonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-9102
Melissa K McConechyImagia Canexia Health, Inc., Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1965-1095
Amy LumDepartment of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9236-2492
Janine SenzDepartment of Molecular Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-5475-4974
Tanner DowhyImagia Canexia Health, Inc., Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-9705-118X
David G HuntsmanImagia Canexia Health, Inc., Vancouver, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6991-9304
Jessica N McAlpineDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. jessica.mcalpine@vch.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6003-485X

Funding

BC Cancer FoundationCanadian Cancer Research SocietyChew Wei Memorial Chair in Gynecologic OncologyMiller-Mindell FellowshipVancouver General Hospital FoundationVCHRI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBiomarkers reflecting real-time response to therapy and recurrence are lacking. We assessed the clinical value of detecting cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations in endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

methodsEC/OC patients undergoing primary surgery were consented for tissue banking and 2-year serial blood draws. Tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA underwent next generation sequencing using a targeted gene panel for somatic mutations.

resultsOf 44 patients (24 EC, 17 OC, 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas [SEOC] and 1 endocervical adenocarcinoma [EA]) at least one somatic mutation was identified in tumor tissue in 40 (91%, 20/24 EC, all OC/SEOC/EA), and in preoperative plasma ctDNA in 12 (27%) patients (6/24 [25%] EC and 6/17 [35%] OC). Detection of preoperative ctDNA mutations was associated with advanced stage, higher preoperative CA125, and subsequent disease recurrence. In 5/12 (42%) patients with preoperative ctDNA mutations, examination/imaging suggested clinical stage I however final pathology revealed stage II/III. In 11 patients where serial timepoints were assessed during treatment for ctDNA and CA125, ctDNA clearance preceded normalization of CA125. Thirteen patients developed recurrent disease (4 EC, 8 OC, 1 EA); 8 in whom ctDNA mutations were detected postoperatively, and 4 followed through time of recurrence with ctDNA mutations identified 2-5 months prior to clinical/radiologic/biomarker progression in 3.

conclusionctDNA can reflect larger tumor volume/metastases, treatment response and subsequent disease recurrence in EC and OC. Careful patient selection is critical to direct resources to patients most likely to benefit, considering disease burden and risk group.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAEndometrial NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCirculating Tumor DNACirculating Tumor DNAEndometrial CancerMutationsOvarian Cancer

Identifiers

PMID38909641
PMCPMC11791001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.