ReviewDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2024
What ergodicity means for you.
Review in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Links Between Daily Positive Parenting and Adolescent Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Daily Adolescent Emotion Regulation.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
- The variability fingerprint of a warming world informing climate risk and solutions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sex-Dependent and Asymmetric Associations of Bodyweight History in the Twenties with Later HbA1c Trajectories in a Japanese Occupational Cohort.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Detecting Critical Change in Dynamics Through Outlier Detection with Time-Varying Parameters.The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology · 2026Article
- Nonergodicity and Simpson's paradox in neurocognitive dynamics of cognitive control.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Non-ergodicity in ecology and evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Beyond the cross-section: Rethinking the intention-behaviour gap through a conceptual and methodological lens.British journal of health psychology · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of graph construction methods for individual brain metabolic network from FDG-PET images: an ADNI study in healthy subjects.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Beyond hypertrophy: a network physiology perspective on the cardio-neuromuscular trade-off in elite soccer.Frontiers in network physiology · 2026Article
- Equipping mathematical models for hospital dynamics using information theory.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Precision Imaging for Intraindividual Investigation of the Reward Response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Group-to-individual generalizability and individual-level inferences in cognitive neuroscience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
- Modeling the dynamics of addiction relapse via the double-well potential system.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2025Article
- Functional connectivity heterogeneity and consequences for clinical and cognitive prediction: Stage 2 registered report.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the relation between within-person and between-person research designs using the concept of ergodicity from statistical mechanics in physics. We demonstrate the consequences of ergodicity using several real data examples from previously published studies. We then create several simulated examples that illustrate the independence of within-person processes from between-person differences, and pair these examples with analytic results that reinforce our conclusions. Finally, we discuss the plausibility of ergodicity being the general rule rather than the exception for social and behavioral processes, address common arguments against heeding the implications of ergodicity for behavioral research, and offer several possible solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.