ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Factors associated with survival after early at-home NIV initiation in ALS patients.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of a machine learning-based survival prediction model for ALS inclusive of the advanced-stage population.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe initiation of early non-invasive ventilation (NIV) often involves a careful balance between tolerance and effectiveness. In amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients, the establishment of a strategy, including the decision to focus on adhering to a cut-off, setting specific targets, or correcting all events, is crucial.
objectiveTo identify factors at 1 month after early at-home NIV initiation that are associated with improved survival in ALS patients. We explored the impacts of adherence (ADH), quality of treatment, and NIV parameters at 1 month after early at-home NIV initiation on patient survival.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 184 ALS patients at the Bordeaux ALS Centre for whom NIV was initiated between September 2017 and June 2021, and we collected data for a minimum period of 2 years after the last patient included. The primary outcome was the risk of death according to baseline characteristics of our population and the NIV parameters and monitoring during the early NIV initiation period. The secondary outcomes were association with NIV ADH during the early NIV initiation period on prognosis, and NIV ADH cut-off for good versus poor prognosis.
resultsAmong the 178 ALS patients analysed, we found that quality of NIV treatment and device settings did not significantly influence prognosis. However, low ADH was significantly associated with a higher risk of death. The use of NIV for > 5 h/day during the early NIV initiation period was linked to a decreased risk of death [hazard ratio = 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.27-0.9].
conclusionThe use of NIV for > 5 h/day during the early NIV initiation period was associated with increased survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38909342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.