Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38909332›Full record

ArticleHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2024

The Role of Transparency in Digital Contact Tracing During COVID-19: Insights from an Expert Survey.

Dennis Krämer, Elisabeth Brachem, Lydia Schneider-Reuter, Isabella D'Angelo, Jochen Vollmann, Joschka Haltaufderheide

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dennis KrämerFaculty of Education and Social Sciences, University of Münster, Münster, Germany. dennis.kraemer@uni-muenster.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-4068
Elisabeth BrachemFaculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Lydia Schneider-ReuterFaculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Isabella D'AngeloFaculty of Health Sciences, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Jochen VollmannFaculty of Medicine, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-6431
Joschka HaltaufderheideJoint Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5014-4593

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KI20527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health technologies such as apps for digital contract tracing [DCT] played a crucial role in containing and combating infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their primary function was to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2 by consistently generating and disseminating information related to various events such as encounters, vaccinations or infections. While the functionality of DCT has been well researched, the necessity of transparency in the use of DCT and the consent to share sensitive information such as users' health, vaccination and location status remains unclear. On one hand, DCT enabled the continuous monitoring of various risk factors, including data-based calculations of infection probabilities. On the other hand, digital monitoring of health risks was closely associated with various uncertainties, such as the ambiguous storage of personal data and its potential future misuse, e.g., by tech companies or health authorities. Our contribution aims to retrospectively analyze the COVID-19 pandemic from a post-pandemic perspective and utilize it as a case study for the implementation of new technological measures. We argue that under the condition of voluntary use of DCT, transparency plays a key role in convincing individuals to install health technologies on their mobile devices, keep them activated and consent to the sharing of sensitive data. We support our argument with qualitative data from an expert survey conducted between 2020 and 2021 and analyzed according to the principles of Grounded Theory.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital contact tracingPrivacyPublic healthQualitative researchTransparency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.