Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38909273›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2024

Factors affecting communication during telephone triage in medical call centres: a mixed methods systematic review.

Siri-Linn Schmidt Fotland, Vivian Midtbø, Jorunn Vik, Erik Zakariassen, Ingrid Hjulstad Johansen

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siri-Linn Schmidt FotlandNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Box 22, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway. sifo@norceresearch.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4505-2990
Vivian MidtbøNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Box 22, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway.
Jorunn VikThe Regional Centre for Emergency Medical Research and Development in Western Norway (RAKOS), Stavanger University Hospital, Box 8100, Stavanger, NO-4068, Norway.
Erik ZakariassenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Box 22, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway.
Ingrid Hjulstad JohansenNational Centre for Emergency Primary Health Care, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Box 22, Bergen, NO-5838, Norway.

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 310468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelephone triage is used to optimise patient flow in emergency primary healthcare. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings and compromise patient safety. To improve quality, a comprehensive understanding of factors affecting communication in medical call centres in primary care is needed. The aim of this review was to identify such factors and to describe how they affect communication during telephone triage.

methodA mixed-method systematic review was performed. In April 2021 and June 2023, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for original studies describing communication during telephone triage in primary care medical call centres handling all types of medical problems from an unselected population. All studies were screened by two authors, blinded to each other's decisions. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. A framework was created by the thematic synthesis of the qualitative data and later used to synthesise the quantitative data. By using convergent integrated synthesis, the qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess methodological limitations.

resultsOut of 5087 studies identified in the search, 62 studies were included, comprising 40 qualitative, 16 quantitative and six mixed-method studies. Thirteen factors were identified and organised into four main themes: organisational factors, factors related to the operator, factors related to the caller and factors in the interaction. Organisational factors included availability, working conditions and decision support systems. Factors related to the operator were knowledge and experience, personal qualities and communication strategies. Factors related to the caller were individual differences and the presented medical problem. Factors in the interaction were faceless communication, connection between operator and caller, third-person caller and communication barriers. The factors seem interrelated, with organisational factors affecting all parts of the conversation, and the operator's communication in particular.

conclusionMany factors affect the structure, content, and flow of the conversation. The operators influence the communication directly but rely on the organisation to create a working environment that facilitates good communication. The results are mainly supported by qualitative studies and further studies are needed to explore and substantiate the relevance and effect of individual factors. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022298022.

Indexed as

Call CentersCommunicationPrimary Health CareTelephoneTriageHumansCommunicationEmergency Medical ServicesOut-of-hours medical careTelenursingTelephone triage

Identifiers

PMID38909273
PMCPMC11193260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.