ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Time to treatment-seeking by caretakers of children under-five with diarrhea and associated factors in Uganda: a multilevel proportional hazards analysis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timely treatment-seeking for diarrheal diseases among caregivers with under-five children in public hospitals of Sidama region, Ethiopia: Unmatched case-control study.Journal of public health research · 2026Article
- Enteric pathogens implicated in acute infectious diarrhea among young children in resource-limited region with rapidly growing population: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiarrhea is considered to be one of the major public health concerns in developing countries. It has a detrimental impact, reflecting one of the highest child mortality rates globally, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, where 2 out of every 10 children in Uganda under the age of five die. The objective of this study was to investigate the factors associated with time to treatment seeking by caretakers of children under-five with Diarrhea in Uganda.
methodDOVE dataset of 745 caretakers in a prospective and retrospective incidence-based study using multi-stage sampling design was used in the assessment. The analysis was done using a time-to-event approach using life tables, Kaplan Meier survival analysis and multilevel proportional hazards model.
resultsKaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated the median time to seeking treatment among 745 caretakers of children under-Five after onset of diarrhea was 2 days. The multi-level proportional hazards model of a Weibull distribution showed that the estimated frailty variance was 0.13, indicating heterogeneity of treatment seeking time by caretakers of under-five children with diarrhea across regions in Uganda. Significant factors found to influence time to treatment-seeking by caretakers of children under-five with diarrhea were, male children (HR = 0.82; 95% CI = 0.71-0.95, p = 0.010), belonging to richest wealth quintile (HR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.05-1.78, p = 0.022), and residing more than 5 km away from a health facility (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.56-0.84, p = 0.000).
conclusionsThere are delays in seeking diarrhea treatment in Uganda because two days are enough to claim a life after dehydration.The policymakers should pay attention to formulate effective intervention to sensitize caregivers on the importance of early treatment-seeking behavior to avoid severe malnutrition caused by diarrhea. Community awareness program should also be encouraged particularly in areas of more than 5 km from the health facility to make people aware of the necessity to take prompt action to seek care in the early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.