Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38909023›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Mapping fast DNA polymerase exchange during replication.

Longfu Xu, Matthew T J Halma, Gijs J L Wuite

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The proofreading mechanism of the human leading-strand DNA polymerase ε holoenzyme.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Longfu XuDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and LaserLab, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0074-3106
Matthew T J HalmaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and LaserLab, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gijs J L WuiteDepartment of Physics and Astronomy and LaserLab, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. g.j.l.wuite@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-043X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive studies on DNA replication, the exchange mechanisms of DNA polymerase during replication remain unclear. Existing models propose that this exchange is facilitated by protein partners like helicase. Here we present data, employing a combination of mechanical DNA manipulation and single fluorescent protein observation, that reveal DNA polymerase undergoing rapid and autonomous exchange during replication not coordinated by other proteins. The DNA polymerase shows fast unbinding and rebinding dynamics, displaying a preference for either exonuclease or polymerase activity, or pausing events, during each brief binding event. We also observed a 'memory effect' in DNA polymerase rebinding, i.e., the enzyme tends to preserve its prior activity upon reassociation. This effect, potentially linked to the ssDNA/dsDNA junction's conformation, might play a role in regulating binding preference enabling high processivity amidst rapid protein exchange. Taken together, our findings support an autonomous replication model that includes rapid protein exchange, burst of activity, and a 'memory effect' while moving processively forward.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, Single-StrandedEscherichia coliProtein BindingDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA, Single-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID38909023
PMCPMC11193749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.