Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38908837›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Adverse effects with semaglutide: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen, Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Johanne Juul Petersen, Pascal Faltermeier, Faiza Siddiqui, Johannes Grand, Helena Dominguez, Anne Frølich, Peter Haulund Gæde, Christian Gluud and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Oral Adverse Effects of Semaglutide Therapy: A Narrative Review.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christina Dam Bjerregaard SillassenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark christina.sillassen@ctu.dk.ORCID 0009-0004-9247-5245
Caroline Barkholt KampCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-4694
Johanne Juul PetersenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9837-1958
Pascal FaltermeierCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faiza SiddiquiCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8358-6259
Johannes GrandAmager-Hvidovre Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-4668
Helena DominguezBispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne FrølichInnovation and Research Centre for Multimorbidity, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Peter Haulund GædeDepartment of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Christian GluudCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole MathiesenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital Koge Centre for Anaesthesiological Research, Koge, Denmark.
Janus JakobsenCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSemaglutide is increasingly used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, overweight and other conditions. It is well known that semaglutide lowers blood glucose levels and leads to significant weight loss. Still, a systematic review has yet to investigate the adverse effects with semaglutide for all patient groups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review and search major medical databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science) and clinical trial registries from their inception and onwards to identify relevant randomised clinical trials. We expect to conduct the literature search in July 2024. Two review authors will independently extract data and perform risk-of-bias assessments. We will include randomised clinical trials comparing oral or subcutaneous semaglutide versus placebo. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be myocardial infarction, stroke, all-cause hospitalisation and non-serious adverse events. Data will be synthesised by meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis; risk of bias will be assessed with Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for statistical and clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol does not present any results. Findings of this systematic review will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024499511.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignSemaglutideGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsSemaglutidemeta-analysispublic healthsafetysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38908837
PMCPMC11331358

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.