ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2024
Sexual Identity Differences in Chronic Pain: Results from the 2019 to 2021 National Health Interview Survey.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns, motivations, and healthcare experiences of medical cannabis use among gender and sexuality diverse people in Australia: findings from the Cannabis as Medicine Survey 2022 (CAMS-22).Harm reduction journal · 2026Article
- "It's probably like a web": complex relationships between pain and mental health among bisexual+ women with chronic pain.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChronic pain has been highlighted as an important public health and clinical health issue. The prevalence of chronic pain has been increasing, with notable disparities for many minoritized populations. However, evidence regarding sexual minoritized populations and chronic pain is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the prevalence of chronic pain among men and women by sexual identity.
methodsData from the 2019 to 2021 National Health Interview Survey (n=78,686), a population-based public health surveillance system were analyzed in 2023-2024. This included 592 lesbian/gay and 952 bisexual women as well as 868 gay and 317 bisexual men. Chronic pain measures included frequency, amount of pain, pain limiting activities, and pain affecting family and others. Covariates included age, race/ethnicity, relationship status, education attainment, income, and employment status.
resultsAfter adjusting for covariates, significantly (p<0.05) more gay/lesbian (26.7%) and bisexual (31.6%) women reported experiencing chronic pain "most days or everyday" than straight women (21.7%). More bisexual women reported chronic pain as well as negative impacts in their life due to chronic pain than straight women. More bisexual men also reported experiencing chronic pain "most days or everyday" compared to straight men (26.1% versus 19.6%), although no differences were found for other aspects of pain.
conclusionsSexual minoritized populations have a greater burden of chronic pain that should be considered in moving forward in pain work. Future work in this area is needed to understand why these disparities exist and how best to provide care and treatment to those affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.