Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38908662›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2024

Residential proximity to toxic metal-emitting industrial sites and toenail metal concentrations in a United States-wide prospective cohort.

Meklit Daniel, Jennifer L Ish, Jessica M Madrigal, Che-Jung Chang, Kaitlyn G Lawrence, Jared A Fisher, Keith E Levine, Brittany A Trottier, Rena R Jones, Dale P Sandler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying differences in U.S. exposure to ubiquitous carcinogens.International journal of hygiene and environmental health · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Meklit DanielEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jennifer L IshEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jessica M MadrigalOccupational & Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Che-Jung ChangEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kaitlyn G LawrenceEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Jared A FisherOccupational & Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Keith E LevineCenter for Analytical Sciences, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Brittany A TrottierHazardous Substances Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rena R JonesOccupational & Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Dale P SandlerEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Alexandra J WhiteEpidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. Electronic address: alexandra.white@nih.gov.

Funding

Cancer Risk and Environmental ExposuresZIACP010125 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI PURDUE, MARK · 2009 to 2025
$41.3M
Environmental and Genetic Risk Factors For Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZIAES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2009 to 2025
$22.7M
Environment and Cancer EpidemiologyZIAES103332 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WHITE, ALEXANDRA · 2019 to 2025
$8.9M
Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: The Sister StudyZ01ES044005 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1999 to 2008
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES044005Intramural NIH HHS Z99 ES999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES044005Intramural NIH HHS ZIA ES103332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndustrial facilities across the United States (US) release millions of pounds of toxic chemicals, including metals. Exposure to toxic metals has been associated with adverse health outcomes, but there is limited evidence on the association between living near metal-releasing facilities and the body burden of emitted compounds.

objectiveTo investigate the association between residential proximity to toxic metal-emitting industrial facilities and toenail metal concentrations and to evaluate whether associations differed by race.

methodsIn a sample of 1556 non-Hispanic Black (32.5%) and non-Hispanic White (67.5%) women from the Sister Study, we used the US Environmental Protection Agency Toxics Release Inventory to identify metal-emitting facilities within 3, 5, and 10 km of participants' baseline residences. We measured toenail concentrations (μg/g) of arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, chromium, and lead. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined associations between residential proximity to and emissions from metal-emitting facilities and toenail metal concentrations, stratifying by race. We explored modification of race-stratified associations by neighborhood deprivation, using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI).

resultsBlack participants were more likely to reside within 3 km of chromium-releasing facilities and 5 and 10 km of all observed metal-emitting sites. Living near metal-releasing facilities was not associated with higher toenail metal concentrations overall. Among Black women, higher chromium emissions exposure was associated with higher toenail chromium levels (β

conclusionsDespite low exposure prevalence, our findings suggest that living near chromium- and lead-releasing facilities, especially at shorter distances, may be associated with higher corresponding toenail metal levels among Black women, particularly those residing in the most disadvantaged areas.

Indexed as

NailsAgedEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHumansManufacturing and Industrial FacilitiesMetalsMetals, HeavyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesResidence CharacteristicsUnited StatesEnvironmental PollutantsMetalsMetals, HeavyChromiumIndustrial pollutionLeadMetalsToenail biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38908662
PMCPMC11323170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.