Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38908297›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2024

Diagnostic and prognostic value of calf circumference for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.

Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Jose Antonio Carnicero, Helio José Coelho-Junior, Riccardo Calvani, Francisco José García-García, Emanuele Marzetti, Francesco Landi, Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Blood-Based Lead Biomarkers and Sarcopenia Indicators in Older Adults.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alejandro Álvarez-BustosBiomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica La Paz (IdiPaz), Madrid, Spain.
Jose Antonio CarniceroBiomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica La Paz (IdiPaz), Madrid, Spain.
Helio José Coelho-JuniorDepartment of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo CalvaniDepartment of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francisco José García-GarcíaBiomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Geriatrics, Hospital Virgen del Valle, Toledo, Spain.
Emanuele MarzettiDepartment of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco LandiDepartment of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Leocadio Rodriguez-MañasBiomedical Research Center Network for Frailty and Healthy Ageing (CIBERFES), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Department of Geriatrics, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica La Paz (IdiPaz), Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: leocadio.rodriguez@salud.madrid.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn age-dependent normative values of calf circumference (CC) has been recently proposed as an accessible proxy for muscle mass. However, its usefulness to estimate sarcopenia has not been assessed. The objectives of the present study were to determine if the substitution of the classical way to assess muscle mass by these values have enough diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value among older adults living in the community.

methodsData from the Toledo Study of Healthy Ageing (TSHA) were used. CC was measured using an anthropometric tape. We used two age-groups CC cut-off points: the TSHA CC median and the one proposed in the Longevity Check-up 7+ (Lookup 7+) project. Sarcopenia was defined based on the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), and FNIH criteria standardized for our population (sFNIH). Frailty (according to the Frailty Phenotype and the Frailty Trait Scale-5) and disability (Katz index) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Mortality and first hospitalization were also recorded. Logistic (incident frailty and worsening disability) and Cox (mortality and hospitalization) regressions were performed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through Kappa index, AUCs, positive and negative predictive values. Predictive ability was assessed through AUCs and integrated AUCs (IAUCs).

results1531 participants (74.8 ± 5.8 years; 45.6% men) were included in the analysis. Prevalence rates of sarcopenia were 22.7% (sFNIH), 15.0% (FNIH), and 13.9% (EWGSOP2). Using TSHA-based cut-points of CC, the prevalence of sarcopenia was 16.8% (sFNIH), 11.0% (FNIH), and 11.5% (EWGSOP2). According to LC7+-based CC cut-off points, sarcopenia prevalence was 17.6% (sFNIH), 11.9% (FNIH), and 12.4% (EWGSOP2). CC cut-off points showed low-to-moderate agreement (Kappa Index values between 0.49 and 0.69) with appendicular lean mass for the evaluation of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia identified by Lookup 7+ and TSHA CC cut-off points was associated with the adverse events examined, with similar AUCs and IAUCs than original sarcopenia definitions, and were lost after adjustment by baseline frailty, except when the original EWGSOP2 definition was used.

conclusionsUsing normalized values of CC as a criteria of muscle mass shows moderate agreement with classical criteria for diagnosing sarcopenia and offer similar predictive value in community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

FrailtyGeriatric AssessmentIndependent LivingLegSarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropometryFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisCalf circumferenceDisabilityFrailtyHospitalizationMortalitySarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID38908297
PMCPMC12878617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.