Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38908011›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

Reactions to a Nicotine Reduction Policy Among Adolescents Who Smoke: A Qualitative Study.

Grace L Reed, Suzanne M Colby, Jasminette DiLorenzo, Julia Totten, Jennifer W Tidey, Rachel N Cassidy

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Grace L ReedCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0806-2842
Suzanne M ColbyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-5936
Jasminette DiLorenzoCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Julia TottenCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer W TideyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Rachel N CassidyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-3733

Funding

University of Vermont Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceU54DA036114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI HIGGINS, STEPHEN T · 2018 to 2022
$19.4M
Center for Tobacco ProductsNCINIDA NIH HHS U54 DA036114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Biden administration is pursuing a nicotine reduction policy in the United States to render cigarettes less addictive. In this study, we qualitatively investigated adolescents' subjective responses to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes, reasons for incomplete adherence to using them, and their expected responses to a nicotine reduction policy. AIMS AND

methodsAdolescents who smoke cigarettes daily (ages 15-19; N = 60) were enrolled in a 3-week double-blind randomized clinical trial and assigned to smoke either normal nicotine content or VLNC research cigarettes. Following the trial, 52 participants completed qualitative interviews about their reactions to the cigarettes and to the idea of a nicotine reduction policy. We utilized a template-style approach to thematic analysis involving immersion in the data, codebook development with both inductive and deductive codes, and iterative refinement of themes.

resultsReasons for incomplete adherence to smoking only research cigarettes focused on dislike for cigarette taste and lower satisfaction compared to usual brand cigarettes. Negative evaluations of research cigarettes were common across both groups. Many participants in both groups reported that they would decrease their smoking or quit entirely if the research cigarettes were the only ones legally available for purchase in the United States.

conclusionsAdolescents may respond to a cigarette nicotine reduction policy by decreasing their cigarette smoking and eventually quitting. These findings suggest a need for public health strategies to reduce smoking initiation and progression in young people and to encourage cessation in the context of a nicotine reduction policy. IMPLICATIONS: Participants' negative subjective responses and challenges with research on cigarette adherence offer insight into factors that might influence young people's reactions to a real-world nicotine reduction policy. Adolescents who smoke may increase their use of alternative tobacco products, especially e-cigarettes, if this policy were implemented. Specifically, themes identified across participant responses highlight important considerations for how such a policy might be implemented with specific attention to the unique smoking behaviors and needs of this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsAdolescentDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleNicotineQualitative ResearchSmoking CessationUnited StatesYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID38908011
PMCPMC11581997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.