ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Liquid and Solid Hybridization Methods to Detect RNAs.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Northern blotting (NB) has been a long-standing method for RNA detection. However, its labor-intensive nature, reliance on high-quality RNA, and use of radioactivity have diminished its appeal over time. Nevertheless, the emergence of microRNAs (miRNAs) has reignited the demand for sensitive and quantitative NB techniques. We have recently developed cost-effective and rapid protocols for RNA detection using solid and liquid hybridization (LH) techniques which exhibit high sensitivity without the need for radioactive or specialized reagents like locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes. Our assays incorporate biotinylated probes and improved techniques for probe hybridization, transfer, cross-linking, and signal enhancement. We demonstrate that while NB is sensitive in detecting mRNAs and small RNAs, our LH protocol efficiently detects these as well as miRNAs at lower amounts of RNA, achieving higher sensitivity comparable to radiolabeled probes. Compared to NB, LH offers benefits of speed, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting mRNAs, small RNAs, and miRNAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38907916What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.