ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2024
Usefulness of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using the Endoscope Manipulator Robot (EMARO).
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical advantages of a new collaborative assistant robot (ANSUR surgical unit) in laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Metachronous reoperation for recurrent and non-recurrent inguinal hernia after primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: propensity score matched analysis of large US claims database.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using an Endoscope Manipulator Robot (EMARO).
methodsThis retrospective study included 51 patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. The transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) has been used to treat inguinal hernias. The patients were divided into two groups: one group underwent laparoscopic surgery using EMARO (E-TAPP) and the other group underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery (L-TAPP). The EMARO is a pneumatically driven endoscope-holder robot. The surgical outcomes of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were compared between the two groups.
resultsFifteen patients underwent E-TAPP, and 36 underwent L-TAPP. The L-TAPP operation requires two personnel, whereas E-TAPP can be performed by one surgeon. The median operation times of the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups were 81 min (range, 77-87) and 70 min (range, 60-94), respectively, and the median blood loss was 5 mL (range, 1-5) and 2 mL (range, 1-5). However, these differences were not statistically significant. The setup time for EMARO was approximately 8 min (range, 5-12). No patient experienced recurrence, and the postoperative complication rates were similar between the two groups. The number of patients who used postoperative analgesics in the E-TAPP and L-TAPP groups was four (n = 15) and 22 (n = 36), respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.042).
conclusionLaparoscopic surgery using EMARO can reduce labor costs and postoperative pain. The surgical outcomes of the E-TAPP group were not inferior to those of the L-TAPP group, and E-TAPP could also be safely performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38907879What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.